Battle of the Portfolios - Do you prefer complex or simple?

I recently finished re-balancing or re-making my portfolio for say the next six to twelve months and as I've been looking at it, I've started to wonder if it is just too complex. Like, am I being paid for the additional risk that I'm taking on? I would like to think so, but this is the topic that we explore in this episode.

The portfolio consists of the following constituents:

QYLD, XYLD, PLTR, SMH, BMBL, HOOD, RBLX, BAC, UAL, M, VSCO, KRE, CPB, and PARA.

The idea is to accumulate QYLD and XYLD as we sell options on the rest.

But is this too much? Would it be simpler and better to invest in a similar portfolio that is made up of just a handful of ETFs thus eliminating the specific risk of any of these companies?

Let me know your thoughts on Twitter @miningtheta.